Wednesday, October 13, 2010

White House Insider On Obama: The President Is Losing It

September 7th 2010
 
A longtime Washington D.C. insider, and former advisor to the Obama election campaign and transition team, speaks out on an administration in crisis, and a president increasingly withdrawn from the job of President.
 
2008 gave America an incredibly charismatic candidate for President of the United States.  Speech after speech showed a candidate with increasing momentum as primary race after primary race concluded.  And then came the nomination, more speeches, culminating in an election night victory. 
 
According to the person sitting across from me, those were incredibly exciting times, even for one who had been a participant with three previous presidential hopefuls. Barack Obama appeared to move from one city to the next effortlessly, gaining confidence and motivation with each campaign stop.  He was remarkable to watch.  He took the script, elevated it with his oration, left the crowds screaming for more, and then would do it all over again, time after time after time.  On the campaign trail, Obama is a machine. 
 
When I asked this insider if the media gave candidate Obama an assist throughout his campaign, it elicits a sly smile.  Sure – we definitely had people in the media on our side.  Absolutely.  We went so far as to give them specific ideas for coverage.  The ones who took that advice from the campaign were granted better access, and Obama was the biggest story in 2008, so yeah, that gave us a lot of leverage. 
 
 Could Obama have succeeded without the media’s help?  Yeah, I think so.  As I said, on the campaign trail he is very-very good.  The opposition didn’t have near the energy, or the celebrity attraction that Obama brings.  Plus, the country was burned out after eight years of Bush.  We knew that going in.  We knew that if we won the Democrat nomination, we were likely going to cruise our way to the White House – and that is exactly what we did.” 
 
But after Obama was sworn in, things began to change?  Almost immediately.  Obama loved to campaign.  He clearly didn’t like the work of being President though, and that attitude was felt by the entire White House staff within weeks after the inauguration.  Obama the tireless, hard working candidate became a very tepid personality to us.  And the few news stories that did come out against him were the only things he seemed to care about.  He absolutely obsesses over Fox News.  For being so successful, Barack Obama is incredibly thin-skinned.  He takes everything very personally. 
 
And you state he despises Joe Biden?  Oh yeah.  That is very well known in the White House.  Obama chose Biden for one reason – to have an older white guy with some international policy credentials.  Period.  If Biden has all of this international experience that Obama found so valuable, why has he buried him under the pile of crap that became the stimulus bill?  What does Joe Biden know about budgets and economics?  Not much – but Obama didn’t care.  Give Joe a job and get him the hell out of my hair – that pretty much sums up the president’s feelings toward Joe Biden. 
 
What about Hillary Clinton?  Obama is scared to death of Hillary.  He doesn’t trust her – obsesses over her almost as much as he does Fox News.  He respects her though, which might be why he fears her so much as well.  He talks the game, but when it comes down to it, she has played the game on a far tougher level than he has, and Obama knows that. 
 
How about Bill Clinton?  I never heard Obama say anything about Bill Clinton personally, though I was told he has cracked a few jokes about the former president since getting into the White House.  I have heard that Bill Clinton does not like Barack Obama.  That really started when Obama played the race card against him during the primary campaign.  Apparently Clinton was apoplectic over that and still hasn’t gotten over it.  If there is one thing I have learned in this town – don’t make an enemy of Bill Clinton. 
 
So if Obama doesn’t appear interested in the job of president, what does he do day after day?  Well, he takes his meetings just like any other president would, though even then, he seems to lack a certain focus and on a few occasions, actually leaves with the directive that be given a summary of the meeting at a later date. I hear he plays a lot of golf, and watches a lot of television – ESPN mainly.  I’ll tell you this – if you want to see President Obama get excited about a conversation, turn it to sports.  That gets him interested.  You start talking about Congress, or some policy, and he just kinda turns off.  It’s really very strange.  I mean, we were all led to believe that this guy was some kind of intellectual giant, right?  Ivy League and all that.  Well, that is not what I saw.  Barack Obama doesn’t have a whole lot of intellectual curiosity.  When he is off script, he is what I call a real “slow talker”.  Lots of ummms, and lots of time in between answers where you can almost see the little wheel in his head turning very slowly.  I am not going to say the president is a dumb man, because he is not, but yeah, there was a definite letdown when you actually hear him talking without the script. 
 
That sounds like you are calling Obama stupid to me.  No – I am not going to call him stupid.  He just doesn’t strike me as particularly smart.  Bill Clinton is a smart guy – he would run intellectual circles around Barack Obama.  And Bill Clinton loved the politics of being president. Obama seems to think he shouldn’t have to be bothered, which has created a considerable amount of conflict among his staff. 
 
So how bad are things at the White House these days?  I don’t know about right now, because I have not been there in over a month.  But I still hear things, and I know what it was like when I left.  It’s not good.  As bad as it might look to voters based on what they do know, it’s much worse.  The infighting is off the charts.  You got a Chief of Staff who despises cabinet members, advisors who despise the Chief of Staff, a President and First Lady having their own issues… 
 
Come again – what about the First Lady?  (The insider takes a deep breath) Ok, look, just like any other marriage, folks have issues.  The Obamas are no different, except of course they are very high profile.  I was told they were having issues before the campaign, and they have even more issues now.  Maybe that is why Obama seems so detached – not so much the stress of the White House, but the stress of personal issues.  I can certainly relate to that kind of situation. 
 
Care to clarify some more on the Obama marriage?  No.  That is all I will say about that.  Don’t ask again. 
 
Ok, back to President Obama then.  In just a few words, how would you describe him these days?  Like I said, it’s been a while since I was last at the White House, but I don’t have a problem saying that the president is losing it. I don’t mean he is like losing his mind.  I mean to say that he is losing whatever spark he had during the campaign.  When you take away the crowds, Obama gets noticeably smaller.  He shrinks up inside of himself.  He just doesn’t seem to have the confidence to do the job of President, and it’s getting worse and worse.  Case in point – just a few days before I left, I saw first hand the President of the United States yelling at a member of his staff.  He was yelling like a spoiled child.  And then he pouted for several moments after.  I wish I was kidding, or exaggerating, but I am not.  The President of the United States threw a temper tantrum.  The jobs reports are always setting him off, and he is getting increasingly conspiratorial over the unemployment numbers.  I never heard it myself, but was told that Obama thinks the banking system is out to get him now.  That they and the big industries are making him pay for trying to regulate them more.  That is the frame of mind the President is in these days.  And you know what?  Maybe he is right, who knows? 
 
Will Obama run again in 2012?  I don’t know. That subject was never brought up again after 2008, at least not around me.  If he does, I think it would have more to do with allowing him another year and a half of campaigning again.  He just loves it so much.  He really needs the crowds, the cheering, the support of the people. 
 
Can he win in 2012?  Oh – absolutely.  Who else campaigns as well as Barack Obama? Nobody.  What politician is more loved and supported by the media?  Nobody.  I don’t see the Republicans offering up a candidate as powerful as Obama. I mean Sarah Palin? Really? Obama would defeat her by a 20 point landslide!  Romney?  The Republicans will enjoy these midterm elections, but 2012 is Obama’s year if he chooses to run again.   As a president, Obama has many flaws, but as a candidate, he is near flawless. 
 
But would another four years of an Obama presidency be the best thing for America?  (Long pause)  Now that is a much more interesting question right there, and a question I think more and more Democrat Party insiders are asking themselves these days, myself included.  I am going to come right out and say it – No.  Obama is not up to the job of being president.  He simply doesn’t seem to care about the work involved.  You want to know what?  Obama is lazy.  He really is. And it is getting worse and worse.  Would another four years of Obama be the best thing for America? No it would not.  What this country needs is a president who is focused on the job more than on themselves.  Obama is not that individual.  I actually hope he doesn’t run again.  Looking back, as much fun as the campaign in 2008 was, Hillary Clinton should have been the nominee.  Hillary was ready to be president.  Obama was not ready.  He had never lost a campaign.  Everything was handed to him.  He doesn’t really understand the idea of work – real, hard, get your heart and soul into it work.  And frankly, that is very disappointing to a whole lot of us… 
 
LATEST WHITE HOUSE INSIDER UPDATES:  Michelle Obama Blowout?
 
The Clintons Are Going For It
 
OBAMA BATTLING SEVERE DEPRESSION:
 

Kindra Arnesen Suffering Health Problems From Life In Southern Louisiana

Kindra Arnesen Suffering Health Problems From Life In Southern Louisiana

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Infant girl kidnapped from hospital

Oct 8th 2010 
 
The baby was kidnapped by men who appeared to be law enforcement and child protective services, without a court order from Concord Hospital, Concord, New Hampshire. Their phone number is, (603) 335-8456.
 
Here is the contact info for child protective services in New Hampshire
New Hampshire Youth and Family Services:
 
Maggie Bishop
(603) 271-4440
mbishop@dhhs.state.nh.us
DCYF Central Intake Unit (800-894-5533)
 
The baby was taken for the father's involvement with Oathkeepers, a coalition of law enforcement, and military who support the Constitution. He is not a paying member.
 
The governor of New Hampshire is John Lynch. He is up to his neck in this tragic removal of a newborn infant less than one day old from her mother from the hospital, without just cause and without legal due process.
 
 
With this precedent, it can happen to anyone. The state has performed a kidnapping of an infant girl, born October 6th, 2010. I hope everyone who sees this will be vociferous in their public outrage. As far as I know, the location of the baby is unknown to the parents and the public. Also unknown is whether she is dead or alive.
 
Government Seizes Newborn Baby Over Political Beliefs Of Parents Couple who took part in Oath Keepers online discussion forum have child snatched in shocking new level of police state persecution.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, October 8, 2010

A newborn baby was ripped from its mother’s arms by officials from the New Hampshire Division of Family Child Services accompanied by police last night after authorities cited the parents’ association with the Oath Keepers organization as one of the primary reasons for the snatch, heralding a shocking new level of persecution where Americans’ political beliefs are now being used by the state to kidnap children.
 
http://www.prisonplanet.com/government-seizes-newborn-baby-over-political-beliefs-of-parents.html

PREGNANT GIRL IN CUFFS AND CHAINS ASSAULTED BY POLICE

PREGNANT GIRL IN CUFFS AND CHAINS ASSAULTED BY POLICE 
 
 
POLICE OFFICERS LIE ABOUT ASSAULTING A PREGNANT WOMAN IN HAND-CUFFS AND BELLY-CHAINS THEN SEND AN INNOCENT MAN TO PRISON FOR 8 YEARS TO COVER IT UP.

Incarceration's impact on society is shameful

Incarceration's impact on society is shameful
By Bob Ray Sanders The Fort Worth Star-Telegram
October 10th 2010
 
You won't need a calculator, but get ready to decipher a bunch of numbers — data that ought to make Americans feel both sadness and shame.
 
For those of us who've kept up with our criminal justice system the past three decades, these numbers I'm about to share are neither surprising nor shocking, but they do paint a startling picture of the impact our high incarceration rate is having on individuals, families and our society as a whole.
 
In a report issued last week by the Pew Charitable Trusts, researchers document the scale of incarceration in the United States and its direct effect on the earning power of former inmates and their children.
 
Collateral Costs: Incarceration's Effect on Economic Mobility, a collaborative effort between Pew's Economic Mobility Project and its Public Safety Performance Project, also breaks down the impact imprisonment has on those of different races. Again, while that news isn't amazing unto itself, it should sound an alarm that will awaken us from our deep sleep of complacency.
 
The United States has the highest rate of incarceration in the world, with 2.3 million Americans behind bars, a 300 percent increase since 1980, the report states. This country has more inmates than the top 35 European countries combined.
 
While the costs of housing prisoners -- $50 billion annually for state correctional costs alone -- should be enough to cause us to rethink our way of doing things, the overall societal and human costs should be even more convincing.
 
The study shows that "One in 87 working-aged white men is in prison or jail, compared with 1 in 36 Hispanic men and 1 in 12 African-American men. More young (20-34) African-American men without a high school diploma or GED are currently behind bars (37 percent) than employed (26 percent)."
 
Perhaps most disturbing is the 2.7 million American children who have a parent behind bars, a massive increase from 25 years ago when 1 in 125 kids had an incarcerated parent compared to 1 in 28 today. And, "two-thirds of these children's parents were incarcerated for non-violent offenses," the report says.
 
"One in 9 African-American children (11.4 percent), 1 in 28 Hispanic children (3.5 percent) and 1 in 57 white children (1.8 percent) have an incarcerated parent," according to Collateral Costs.
 
We've known for some time that imprisonment makes it tough for an individual to get a job or find housing once he or she is released.
 
The report notes that "serving time reduces hourly wages for men by approximately 11 percent, annual employment by 9 weeks and annual earnings by 40 percent." The typical former inmate, by age 48, will have earned $179,000 less than if he had never been incarcerated.
 
Before being imprisoned, more than two-thirds of male inmates had jobs and more than half were the primary source of financial support for their children, the study shows. When a released inmate can't take care of his family, guess who bears the costs?
 
According to the study, "Children with fathers who have been incarcerated are significantly more likely than other children to be expelled or suspended from school (23 percent compared with 4 percent).
 
And noting that education and parental income are strong indicators of children's future economic mobility, the report points out: "Family income averaged over the years a father is incarcerated is 22 percent lower than family income was the year before a father is incarcerated. Even in the year after the father is released, family income remains 15 percent lower than it was the year before incarceration."
 
The study didn't just talk about the problems, but offered solutions, such as: proactively reconnecting former inmates to the labor market; helping the person's economic condition by capping the percent of offenders' income subject to deductions for court-ordered fines, fees, etc.; screening and sorting convicted people by the risks they pose to society; and shorten prison stays by the use of earned-time credits.
 
As a society we must come up with an alternative to lifetime punishment for those who make mistakes. Otherwise, we're dooming a large number of offenders and their children to a lifetime of failure.
 
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
 
We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.
Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.
 

9/11: The Unidentified Murder Weapons

9/11: The Unidentified Murder Weapons

Monday, October 11, 2010

The New Credit-Card Tricks

October 11th 2010
 
Banks and credit card issuers wasted no time in taking to think up new billing practices that is calculated and met to trip up consumers just months after government legislation banned certain billing practices meant to protect us.  The head of the new Bureau of Consumers Financial Protection has the challenging task of keeping ahead of the credit-card industry and for every step the Bureau makes the credit-card industry finds a way to maneuver around the new laws. Jessica Silver-Greenburg goes over these new tricks the credit card industry as enacted that now affect us.
 
The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, known as the Card Act, was intended to reshape the contours of consumer finance. Among other things, it forces card issuers to give customers more notice about interest-rate increases and restricts certain controversial billing practices such as inactivity fees.
 Yet some of the biggest card issuers in the U.S., including Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C – News), J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM – News) and Discover Financial Services (NYSE: DFS – News), are already rolling out a slew of fees designed to recapture some of their lost income, in part by skirting the new rules. Some banks may even be violating the law outright, say consumer advocates.
 
“Card companies are figuring out how to replace old fees with new ones,” says Victor Stango, an associate economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and a professor at the University of California, Davis, who has been analyzing how the Card Act will affect consumer banking. “It’s a race between regulators writing ever-more-complex laws and credit-card companies setting up ever-more-complex fees.”
 
The banks have a big gap to fill. The Card Act is expected to wipe out about $390 million a year in fee revenue, according to David Robertson, the publisher of industry newsletter Nilson Report. On July 16, during its second-quarter earnings call with analysts, Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC – News) Chief Financial Officer Charles Noski warned that the Card Act and other regulatory changes would prompt the bank, the nation’s largest in assets, to write off up to $10 billion in the third quarter.
 
“If you have every major issuer saying that we are losing our shirt, then that speaks volumes,” Mr. Robertson says. “Proportionately, these fees should be understood as almost inconsequential compared to the losses.” So the banks are getting aggressive. According to a July 22 report from Pew Charitable Trusts, a nonpartisan research group, the industry’s median annual fee on bank credit cards jumped 18% to $59 between July 2009 and March 2010. At credit unions, annual fees soared 67% to $25. During the same period, the median cash-advance and balance-transfer fees jumped by 33%.
 
All of these increases are perfectly legal, of course. Banks and other issuers would have a difficult time extending credit to consumers, even at high interest rates, if they couldn’t augment those revenues with fee income. “We’re coming out of a deep recession that issuers are still working through,” says Peter Garuccio, a spokesman for the American Bankers Association. But some banks may be going too far. In a July 7 letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulates many of the biggest U.S. banks, a coalition of consumer groups including the National Consumer Law Center, the Consumer Federation of America and Consumer Action flagged several “potential violations of the Credit Card Act.”
 
Other banks are ramping up their marketing of so-called professional cards. These are like corporate cards but can carry the same terms as consumer cards—and aren’t covered under the new law. In the first quarter of this year, issuers sent out 47 million professional-card offers to U.S. households, up from 13.2 million in the corresponding period last year, according to research firm Synovate.
 
‘Saddled With Late Fees’ Alan Condon of Woodstock, Ga., says he carefully reviews his card statements each month, and even read the Card Act—all 33 pages—after it was passed in May 2009. Among other things, the Card Act stipulates that late-payment fees shouldn’t be triggered on a Sunday or holiday, when there is no mail delivery. The rule “is clearly meant to offer cardholders some semblance of relief so that they don’t get saddled with late fees for making a reasonable payment on the next business day,” says Chi Chi Wu, a consumer credit lawyer at the National Consumer Law Center.
 
Mr. Condon says he was shocked when he opened his credit-card statement dated June 18 and saw that Discover had charged him $39 for a late payment—and had upped his interest rate on future purchases from 17% to 24.99%. He says the company considered him late because he paid on June 14, instead of June 13, a Sunday. “I just got mad,” says the 56-year-old computer-software developer, who says he had never before been late on a Discover payment. “We were in compliance with the Card Act,” says Discover spokesman Matthew Towson. “The law states that if a creditor does not receive or accept payments on weekends or holidays, then the date is extended. But we accept payments seven days a week.” Nevertheless, Discover reviewed Mr. Condon’s account at The Wall Street Journal’s request and decided to waive the late fee and reduce Mr. Condon’s interest rate to its earlier level.
 
The Card Act also stipulates that issuers can’t jack up rates on existing balances unless a cardholder is at least 60 days late. But there is a creative maneuver around that: the so-called rebate card. Citibank rolled out rebate-card offers to some of its customers last fall, offering to refund up to 70% of finance charges when customers pay on time. The problem: Rebate offers aren’t governed by the Card Act, and an issuer can revoke them suddenly and hit cardholders with high charges. The net result is the same as raising rates—and because it is perfectly legal, customers have little recourse. “Rebates on finance payments may seem like a good deal, but you could end up with a very high interest rate suddenly,” says Mr. Frank, of the Center for Responsible Lending. “The rebate offer is clear, transparent, and we believe fully within the spirit of the Card Act,” says Citigroup spokesman Samuel Wang. Shortening the billing cycle is another new tactic some banks may be using. The Card Act requires companies to provide a window of at least 21 days from when a statement is mailed and when payment is due. Yet the National Consumer Law Center and Consumer Action say they have received complaints from borrowers who allege that their billing cycles have been shortened to fewer than 21 days. “Since the passage of the act, we’ve heard from numerous borrowers alleging that they are shortchanged on billing cycle time,” says Joe Ridout, a consumer-services manager at Consumer Action.
 
Inactivity Fees Return As expected, issuers also are raising basic fees in the wake of the Card Act, in some cases significantly. Many credit-card companies, for example, are increasing their balance-transfer charges sharply. “We are seeing an increase across the board in fees because card companies are sensitive about their ability to price for risk,” says Mr. Robertson of the Nilson Report. Last June, for example, J.P. Morgan’s Chase unit alerted customers that its maximum balance-transfer fee was rising to 5% from 2% on a wide range of its cards.
 
“In a higher-loss environment, it’s important that we are prudent with our balance-transfer offers,” says Stephanie Jacobson, a spokeswoman for the bank. She adds that “We often do have lower rates in a competitive marketplace.” Companies are raising their minimum finance charges, too. Before the Card Act, the average minimum monthly finance charge was about 50 cents, according to Nick Bourke, director not seem like a lot, but it adds up: Borrowers pay $430 million a year in minimum-finance charges alone, according to the Center for Responsible Lending.
 
The Card Act’s provisions are being implemented in stages, with the last phase taking effect on Aug. 22. After that, issuers will no longer be able to charge “inactivity fees,” or extra charges for people who don’t spend a certain amount each year. So companies are dressing them up in other ways. Citigroup, for example, has started charging some of its customers an annual fee, which can be waived if a customer’s card activity exceeds $2,400 a year Tristan Denyer of San Francisco says he was surprised when he got a notice that Citigroup was instituting a $60 annual fee on his card. Mr. Denyer, 37, a senior Web designer, says he rarely carried a balance on his card, and refused to rack up the $2,400 in charges necessary to erase the fee. “I figured this was just a tactic to get me to spend more and give them more money,” Mr. Denyer says. He says he decided to close his account.
 
Citigroup’s Mr. Wang acknowledges that Card Act rules forbid the waiving of annual fees based on “a customer’s annual spending on the card.” He adds, however, that “the rules will not prohibit cash-back rewards or similar incentives that encourage account usage.” Another potential trap: low-credit-limit cards, which are popular among college students. The Card Act says a card’s total annual fees can’t exceed 25% of a borrower’s credit line. But some issuers may be evading the fee restrictions by charging an upfront processing fee that doesn’t fall under the 25% cap. First Premier Bank, headquartered in Sioux Falls, S.D., offers several low-credit-limit cards. Its Centennial card comes with a $300 limit and a $95 upfront processing fee.
 
Melinda Robinson of Lorena, Texas, learned firsthand how rapidly fees could eat into her credit limit. After receiving a card with a $250 credit limit from First Premier, she says, she was immediately charged $170 in combined fees. When she tried to use the card for the first time, she exceeded her credit limit, triggering more fees. “When they first send you the card, they automatically charge you fees that eat up half of it,” says Ms. Robinson. First Premier Bank’s president and chief executive, Miles Beacom, says the $95 processing fee doesn’t violate the Card Act because it is assessed before the account is opened. He adds that the fee offsets the risk associated with offering these cards to “high-risk individuals .” Foreign-transaction fees are on the march as well. The average fee for foreign transactions has jumped to 3% of the transaction from roughly 2% in 2008, according to Ben Woolsey, director of marketing and consumer research at Creditcards.com. Some card holders are finding they don’t even need to leave their living room to get hit with a foreign-transaction fee. Ruth Ann Sando, a small-business owner in Washington, says she has been burned repeatedly on her Visa card issued by Pentagon Federal Credit Union, the third-largest credit union in the U.S. Ms. Sando used to do a lot of business with AbeBooks, an online retailer. But she found that she was getting hit with foreign-transaction fees even though her purchases were in dollars. That is because while the seller and shipper were based in the U.S., Abe, headquartered in Canada, provides the forum for book sellers and collects a portion of the proceeds from all sales. So late last year, Ms. Sando says, she decided to stop buying from the site altogether. “Not buying books is the only way I can protest the fee,” she says. “The fee is legal, but all these fees circumvent the [Card Act's] goal of clear and straightforward pricing,” Mr. Woolsey says. Pentagon Federal Credit Union says some of its cards carry a foreign-transaction fee of 2% of the U.S. dollar amount of the transaction.
 
Fighting Back While the credit-card landscape may seem littered with landmines, there are ways to guard against some of the worst pitfalls. The first and simplest: Make your card payments on time. Second, say consumer advocates, people should dispute fees directly with the issuer when they believe something is amiss. “Cardholders would be surprised at how much they can raise hell and get a change,” says Mr. Condon, who says he immediately contacted Discover after the late charge appeared on his statement. They might have to make repeated calls, however. “While the Credit Card Act did make great strides in protecting consumers, it in no way closed all avenues for cardholders to get hit with fees,” says Ms. Wu, from the National Consumer Law Center. “It’s a first step.”

US Physics Professor: 'Global Warming Is the Greatest and Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud I Have Seen in My Long Lif

by James Delingpole
Ocotber 11th 2010
 
Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society.
 
Anthony Watts describes it thus:
 
    This is an important moment in science history. I would describe it as a letter on the scale of Martin Luther, nailing his 95 theses to the Wittenburg church door. It is worthy of repeating this letter in entirety on every blog that discusses science.
 
It’s so utterly damning that I’m going to run it in full without further comment. (H/T GWPF, Richard Brearley).
 
    Dear Curt:

    When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?
 
    How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.
 
    It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.
 
    So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:
 
    1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate
 
    2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in)distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.
 
    3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.
 
    4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.<
 
    5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.
 
    6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.
 
    APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?
 
    I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.
 
    I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.
    Hal
 
Harold Lewis is Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chmn of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II; books: Technological Risk (about, surprise, technological risk) and Why Flip a Coin (about decision making)
 
James Delingpole is a writer, journalist and broadcaster who is right about everything. He is the author of numerous fantastically entertaining books including Welcome To Obamaland: I've Seen Your Future And It Doesn't Work, How To Be Right, and the Coward series of WWII adventure novels. His website is www.jamesdelingpole.com.

Traficant’s Finest Hour: He Beats Fed Conspiracies

By Jim Traficant
 
Recent national stories have highlighted U.S. attorneys and their abuse of power. The criticism is beginning to grow from all areas of America. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has countered that they’ve “only” had 201 identified cases of prosecutorial misconduct in the last 10 years. These bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. maintain that an average of 20 per year is an insignificant number when you consider the number of cases they handle. The DOJ claims to have prosecuted over 60,000 cases per year, arguing that, in most cases, attorney “error” is most likely the culprit, not “misconduct.”
 
Here are two cases to digest; decide for yourself. The first is that of John Demjanjuk, the retired auto worker from Cleveland, Ohio who the DOJ charged with mass murder, claiming he “operated the gas chambers” at the Treblinka Concentration Camp in Poland during World War II.
 
DOJ prosecutors claimed that Demjanjuk was, in fact, the infamous “Ivan the Terrible.” Demjanjuk’s citizenship was stripped away. He was then extradited to Israel to “stand trial for his crimes.” The family came to me for help, reluctantly, knowing that I was not a DOJ favorite. They had been to “every congressional office and every senator’s office.” Nobody would talk to them. The son, John Demjanjuk Jr., and son-in-law, Ed Nishnic, claimed to have favorable evidence that supported John Sr.’s innocence. So, I investigated.
 
An area newspaper wrote “Traficant supports Nazi mass murderer.” Other politicians, at all levels, said I was crazy. Demjanjuk was tried, convicted and sentenced to death. But my investigation proved that Demjanjuk was innocent. To boot, I even proved the true identity of “Ivan the Terrible,” a man named Ivan Marchenko. So his first name was Ivan. Go figure.
 
The DOJ denied my evidence. The 6th Circuit Court refused my evidence. The evidence was delivered to the Israeli Supreme Court. After reviewing the evidence, the Israeli Supreme Court phoned me at my hotel in Jerusalem and said, “Demjanjuk will be delivered to you tomorrow night; take him home.”
 
All my evidence came from the DOJ. They knew he wasn’t “Ivan,” but they would have let him be executed. When we landed in America, the 6th Circuit of Cincinnati, Ohio issued a statement: “A tragic, but, honest mistake by the government.”
 
Tragic, yes. Honest, no. Office of Special Investigations prosecutors should’ve been prosecuted for their serious crimes: subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, violation of Demjanjuk’s civil rights, conspiracy and complicity in attempted murder.
 
Ah, but Demjanjuk was just a Ukrainian guy from Cleveland. Well, when you violate the rights of one American, you endanger the rights of all. The second case I know in and out—because it was mine. The DOJ spent more than $15 million and assigned 250 agents to investigate me over six years— and our country was attacked and more than 3,500 people were killed on Sept. 11, 2001 during that time.
 
At trial, the DOJ admitted they “had no physical evidence.” They even testified that they didn’t even have a tape recording of my voice because they “didn’t tape” it.
 
If you believe that, you’re either na�ve or uneducated. Former Secret Service Agent Mike Robertson said, “The government made tapes. They probably had boxes of tapes. They said they had no tapes because they had no evidence of crimes by Traficant, and Traficant could’ve used their own tapes to prove his innocence. Traficant was railroaded.”
 
Seven witnesses said they bribed me. Two men, Richard Detore and Namdi Okolo, stated the government “pressured” them to lie. Four other witnesses testified that government witnesses confided in them that they “lied to avoid prison.”
 
The judge made those four witnesses testify in open court, subject to perjury charges, but “excused” the jury and never let it hear their evidence. Not one was charged with perjury.
 
They could snatch me tomorrow and send me back to prison for saying this, but the judge and the government knowingly broke the law to convict me.
 
One last thing: The former clerk for Chief Judge Lambros, attorney Percy Squires, testified that John Cafaro lied. The judge made his testimony look “controversial.”
 
Now that Americans are recognizing the “crimes” committed by government attorneys, the DOJ is harping. Do I hear violins? Get back at me!
 
James A. (Jim) Traficant, Jr. was born in Youngstown, Ohio on May 8, 1941. He received BS and MS degrees from the University of Pittsburgh. He also received an MS from Youngstown State University in 1976. From 1981-1985 he served as sheriff of Mahoning County, prior to his election to the U.S. Congress in 1984. He was re-elected by overwhelming margins every year up until 2002 when, following his conviction on trumped up corruption charges, he was expelled from the House of Representatives. Listen to Jim’s Saturday radio program from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Time on WTAM 1100 in Cleveland, Ohio.  You can also view it on WTAM.com. Click on the web cam button.

Sunday, October 10, 2010

The Trembling House of Cards is Beginning to Tumble.

by Les Visible
October 7th 2010
 
Dog Poet Transmitting.......
 
All night long I was moving in an unusual dream. Parts of it were sublime and beautiful. They had to do with things in life that were also sublime and beautiful but hadn’t defined themselves to me as such. Other parts had to do with numbers and connections to the Madrid Train Station, London Tube and 911, Dark Nobility, Zio-engineered, false flag attacks on, or by, transportation mediums. Transportation mediums are critical to the façade because they translate into restricted movement by the world community. They translate into restrictive laws, which also translate into economic low jinks and deceptive perceptions of high profit, victim industries.
 
This all resulted in date numbers that contained a 9 with the advertisement of 10 where 9, as it normally does, precedes 10, with the inference of a day short and a dollar late. Dates didn’t and don’t sequentially add or decrease in incremental reduction and I wasn’t engaged in calculation, just watching. I’m not engaged in calculation at the moment either. That’s not my field. I’ve done some amount of in the way one plays around with these things but my motive is to keep the imminence in front of the mind of the reader.
 
The likelihood of massive cultural and geo-political change seems extreme between now and the end of November. I suspect even the densest will sense they are frogs in a slow boiling pot.
 
The residents of The Gulf of Mexico are experiencing terrible things across the board and little is being said about it in the, near exclusively Zionist controlled, media. This control of the media came about due to their control of the money system. If you can print the money, you can decide who gets it and you can decide how the economy will behave in respect of the lumpen proletariat, in their endless adjustments on the hamster wheel. Signs of global unrest are either presented as indifferent routines or not presented at all. It’s not just seeing through a glass darkly but also a funhouse mirror that shifts according to the needs and appetites of those ‘who think’ they are running the show. The flowering of the holocaust in the gulf is bordered by fields of poppies and poisonous nightshade.
 
The signs are pretty clear and demand scrutiny for those who are not natively inclined to playing blindman’s bluff on a busy interstate. In times of extreme materialism, you get certain predictable partnerships. They’re long term, temporary ‘hookups’ between qualities that have the capacity to amplify each other, like blindness and stupidity, greed and ignorance and so on and so forth. You can see these hookups in operation all around you in various circle jerks and cluster fucks, which have the appearance of seasonal celebrations among the natives.
 
There’s so much irony in the air that the trees are dripping with it and the landscape is drenched. Like a beautiful sunset on a remote desert mesa, it’s a pity there are so few around to appreciate it but… people don’t travel to places like that (outside or inside of themselves) to see things like that, especially when the irony includes them as a major player/example in its presentation. Minds like these view civilization as a spiraling improvement over native cultures, as if the one were a spiral toward a bright and beckoning future and the other a state of circular ignorance. The reverse is the truth (except for the manner of the spiral) and that is one reason that irony moves among us like The Invisible Man. It’s also hard to get out of the shit if you don’t see yourself as being in the shit to begin with. It’s hard to identify offensive smells if you think they are high end pheromones; like that ‘rolling in the road kill’ metaphor I refer to on occasion. It’s no wonder people wind up sleeping with the devil and screaming “Oh God” at the same time. 
 
Awakening people have two dangers they have to be aware of; the vampire overlords ‘and’ the people around them.
 
One of my biggest wakeup calls of late has been the clear evidence that I have no idea of what’s going to happen or when it’s going to happen or how it’s going to sort out. It appears that I, like many another, had some kind of a picture in my mind with a general impression of certain conditions in combination with basic human temperament; counter pointed by tarantellas being danced by ravenous super swine and quick moving bat weasels, whipping through a moonless night. I haven’t any real idea and the most critical point is always how it arranges itself around you. Things can be painful at a distance but they can be truly terrible up close.
 
One thing I remain confident about is that the predators and perpetrators of replicating evil are being exposed for a particular reason that has to do with the direction in which the director wants to move the movie or… you could just attribute it to a calculation of basic appetites inflamed by materialism and degrees of control or the lack of it. You have to toss in fear and you’ve got something better to be observed than to be engaged in.
 
Those manipulating the organs of information have achieved one thing in particular. They hired and keep employed only those who serve the system. This means that no matter how smart someone may be, if they are appearing in the mainstream media, something is compromising their message and that is anything from a broken moral compass to a preponderance of self interest, in conflict with the needs of those who consider what they have to say. It’s like being surrounded by retarded yes men because the truly useful aren’t going to sacrifice their being in order to follow you somewhere that you have no idea you are headed to. You can extrapolate all of that at your leisure, so long as leisure remains.
 
I realize now, on a personal level, that my own plans were being hindered and made difficult due to a matter of timing and not because they were being canceled for mysterious reasons. You are ultimately the protectorate or victim of what you believe in. The other factor is… is it real to begin with? That’s something you find out soon enough or too late to alter. You become wise or a statistic.
 
The hardest thing for people to grasp is that the whole charade is under control and not by those who keep giving the appearance that it is they are who are in control. In my dream last night, the most compelling feature was the serenity that came in and out of the other scenarios that were being screened. I felt as if I was being assured beyond anything I knew and I didn’t know anything. I suppose you could say it is like feeling really good and having a wonderful time without really knowing why.
 
Rich people are buying large amounts of physical gold. That can have certain consequences, since the far larger population of oppressed and starving poor will know where to find it. A great many of them work in the homes of these people and are related to a great many more of the same.
 
Powerful political and financial interests, who command large armies, seem unaware of how those armies can turn against them. They seem clueless about the dangers of employing bodyguards to protect them when those bodyguards can simply walk off with everything they have, or eliminate them and use that location as a defensible fortress. I suppose that’s just more irony. They don’t comprehend how the lambs of vengeance suckle at the teats of irony.
 
We’re on the rim finally. The rim is graded and wider than one might expect but… it’s a big mountain. It’s as big as the time it’s taken to climb it. There’s something over the edge of the rim, which is approaching in a multi dimensional manner. I suspect the view will be different, dependent on who is doing the viewing. It’s like the passengers on a high end roller coaster. Some of them are screaming in excitement and some of them are screaming in fear. It’s still the same roller coaster. It depends on what you believe in and it may very definitely depend on what believes in you.
 
End Transmission.......

Hungary sludge flood called 'ecological disaster'

Hungary sludge flood called 'ecological disaster'

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Nancy Pelosi says food stamps and unemployment insurance will grow US economy

Nancy Pelosi says food stamps and unemployment insurance will grow US economy
October 8th, 2010
http://www.examiner.com/american-politics-in-vancouver/nancy-pelosi-says-food-stamps-and-unemployment-insurance-will-grow-us-economy

In foreclosure controversy, problems run deeper than flawed paperwork

In foreclosure controversy, problems run deeper than flawed paperworkBy Brady Dennis and Ariana Eunjung Cha
Washington Post Staff Writers
October 7, 2010

Eliminate This Everyday Food and Watch Your High Blood Pressure Plunge By Dr. Mercola

Eliminate This Everyday Food and Watch Your High Blood Pressure Plunge
By Dr. Mercola 
October 08 2010

Stolen Kennedy Bonds: Who Dunit?

Stolen Kennedy Bonds: Who Dunit?

FEDERAL NOTARY BILL ATTEMPTS TO GRANT FULL PARDON TO LENDER, NOTARIES, WITNESSES

FEDERAL NOTARY BILL ATTEMPTS TO GRANT FULL PARDON TO LENDER, NOTARIES, WITNESSES
by Neil Garfield
October 6, 2010
 

Friday, October 8, 2010

Gold and Silver Breakout as Fascist Business Model Crumbles, Mortgage Market Fraud

by Jim Willie
Market Oracle
October 7th 2010   
 
Some significant events are in progress, extremely important developments in the grand pathogenesis that reflects the deep decay and deterioration in the US financial structure. The most recent events pertaining to mortgage loans, home foreclosures, and disclosed fraud carry great potential to open extremely wide cracks in the American social order. Revealed systemic fraud is slowly coming into the open. Civil disobedience has already entered the arena of popular protest. However, the recent events surrounding illegal home foreclosure seizure of properties elevates the exposed fraud to a very clear high new level. This is a boil ready to break open, releasing financial puss.
 
The cases where people have been removed from their homes, even when no bank loan exists (as in owned free & clear), by means of fraudulent, forged, and counterfeited documents, has finally provoked RICO law provisions. Witness organized crime extended from Wall Street, whose roots lie most likely in Fannie Mae itself. The legal industry has finally joined the fray in class action lawsuits. Defense citing errors made have been met with accusations of fraud, quite a different game.
 
The Racketing Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 was designed to fight organized crime. RICO has been invoked in class action lawsuits in at least two states in the past month, each related to mortgage fraud, securities fraud, and illegal property seizures. At the center of the firestorm lie JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and GMAC (now called Ally). Little did the USCongress realize that RICO laws might be used to fight profoundly deep criminal fraud on Wall Street. When the criminal activity is tracked with some forensic analysis, the roots are found with REMICs, those perverse financial instruments that functioned as umbilical cords to Fannie Mae in past years, acting like powerful centrifuges. They fed the housing bubble and mortgage finance bubble, each valued over $10 trillion in size. Bear in mind that RICO has been used primarily against mafias and crime organizations dealing with gambling, drugs, and prostitution, where property seizures are routinely carried out. Abuses have been seen in states like Florida, where motorboat owners guilty of owning small bags of marijuana have lost their boats in legal seizure. It seems that selective enforcement is obvious. The target within the crosshairs has moved to Wall Street banks and Fannie Mae under the USGovt protective wing. These are dangerous times.
 
Recent cases threaten to encourage the Strategic Defaults and highly charged Civil Disobedience which could actually contribute in powerful ways to commercial chaos, popular disorder, public disruptions, creeping distrust, and even systemic failure. Hundreds of thousands of people are not making their mortgage payments, intentionally stopping payments, many when they do have the ability. Over 250 thousand Bank of American mortgage holders have stopped making monthly payments, in open defiance and some financial distress. The topic of Strategic Default, together with challenges (even with attorneys) to the banks to produce legal property titles, has grown sharply in practice. The RICO cases underway threaten to toss an accelerant on that fire. Henry David Thoreau would certainly be observing closely, perhaps smiling, at the current developments of citizen action against corrupt bank practices, mortgage bond fraud, and forgery of securities as well as critical legal documents. His essay had a profound effect on me when young, when cruel abuses were observed within my catholic school locally and the Vietnam War globally. Of course, the Jackass does not sponsor, endorse, or encourage any such action, believing that the highest level bankers should receive their due. The question is what is due? Objective reporting of the news, such as the viral news of the fraudulent home foreclosures, seems to have escaped the mainstream news, a consistent theme that hints of syndicate sympathy or culpability. The last thing a network news systems wants is to encourage civil disobedience. They prefer to promote vast herds of docile sheep.
 
For four years, the Jackass has claimed that Fannie Mae lies at the core of a grand criminal fraud enterprise, serving as the central clearing house for USGovt agency sponsors of magnificent fraud. Their tools are mortgage loans, mortgage bonds, REMICs, and more recently the MERS title database. Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits were a necessary piece to the housing and mortgage bubble, from which extends colossal fraud. The REMIC acted like a mortgage futures contract, clear of any supervision or regulatory oversight and thus permitting an open door government green light signal to systemic fraud. Imagine a leveraged futures contract on twin bubbles where unbridled fraud was common. Recall that $1500 billion went missing from 1988 to 2000 in two HUD regional offices. One was Houston and the other was Oklahoma City, the home grounds for sitting presidents. The missing funds have fed black bag funds and diverse illicit financial operations. Few connect any association between the pyrotechnic events in April 1995 by Timothy McVeigh to big rooted branches and critical data records, an open question. The entire set of prima facie and secunda facie and tertia facie aspects of the mushrooming story are to be covered in the October Hat Trick Letter reports. But honestly, this is a huge moving target, whose capture is better described as herding cats on an open field.
 
M.E.R.S. DATABASE – THE WEAK LINK
 
The mushroom has a primary point of vulnerability that has received very little attention. The Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems (MERS) was originally an innovative process that simplified the way mortgage ownership and servicing rights were originated, sold, and tracked. MERS is a property title database, intended by Wall Street and Fannie Mae to serve as a repository that kept order when mortgage bonds were traded fast and furious. In recent court cases in at least three states, the MERS database failed to attain legal standing in mortgage foreclosure challenges. The holder of the note (home loan) could not combine with the MERS database (title holder) to win property seizure. The system began to unravel. Now in at least one state, the MERS database is directly cited in a criminal fraud class action lawsuit that invokes the RICO statutes. MERS is the financial system's Achilles Heel. Maybe a big bank like Bank of America might collapse, fall into ruin, and dissolve from proof of racketeering, its assets confiscated by aggrieved parties to fraud. Obviously, Bank of America along with several other big banks have been dead for a long time, since October 2008 in my estimation. If not for the lax and complicit accounting rules by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which permit banks to declare their own fictitious value for their balance sheet assets, imposed in April 2009, the big banks would undergo liquidation. They cling to control of the USGovt financial purse, its USDollar printing press, its conduits to financial centers, and its extended arm to legal prosecution control. Big bank liquidation is tantamount to liquidation of the entire US financial structure, its power and privilege, in plain words.
 
MERS has gained unwanted damaging attention in the legal arenas, and it will not go away. The class action lawsuits will establish the high ground, grow in number, and gain attention. The proof of the malfeasance, fraud, and forgery will be incredibly easy, breathtaking in implications, and shocking to the sleepy public. The risk of civil disobedience is acute. The directly associated risk of commercial degradation from contract law moving toward a field of abandonment is also acute. The domino effect carries risk to the business and thus the social fabric of the American society. The United States is on the verge of events leading to potential systemic failure. Few attribute causality to the Fascist Business Model broad implementation and secretive endorsement, but it lies at the center. The permitted criminal activity, not just with bond fraud, mortgage fraud, and property theft, extends far beyond white collar crimes. Take for instance the suspicious suicide of Freddy Mac CFO David Kellermann, found hanging by the neck in his Virginia living room in April 2009. He knew too much and wanted out, some believe. His suicide probably had assistance. My sources tell of a wave of middle level murders, where bankers have been systematically eliminated. The victims knew too much about the money trails, but lacked a critical level of protective support from rank. They are the dead mules. They were high enough to have knowledge, but not high enough to avoid being expendable. MERS is the errant tool. RICO is the thick cloud. Fannie Mae (FNM) is the grand sewage pit laced with fraud. The news is rarely reported unless they must since it is already widely known. The mainstream news finds itself competing desperately with the competent intrepid internet sources. In a strange attempt to force an equation from a disorderly situation, let it be simply stated that
 
MERS + RICO + FNM = CHAOS + FAILURE + DEFAULT
 
FASCIST BUSINESS MODEL CRUMBLES
 
One is left to wonder if it is possible that foreign creditors can invoke RICO laws and take over USGovt assets as part of a USTreasury default process? They might do so agency by agency, but start with the helm on Wall Street. By next year, national parks and lands will be sold off to creditors. The deep fraud is easy to prove. Identification of the participants is much more difficult. The movement of prosecution and perhaps restitution will begin with private homeowners, the vassals in the lost field of dreams. A crucial connection on legal obligation is the formal USGovt guarantee of USAgency Mortgage Bonds, which make them full blood brothers to USTreasury Bonds. They just pay a different yield, although we are witnessing a convergence between mortgage rates and USTreasury yields. The Fannie Mae cesspool is certain to drag down the global confidence and prestige of the USTreasury Bond itself, a process underway. Perhaps the USCongress can hastily include a rider on some war appropriation bill or jobless insurance bill or some other bill that is approved but not examined, which exempts USGovt agencies and Wall Street firms from RICO prosecution, even ex-post facto to cover past pecadillos. Harken back to Hank Paulson as USTreasury Secretary, trying to explain Wall Street bond fraud as errors of judgment. The ploy did gain some traction, but the recent lawsuits over mortgage fraud, forged foreclosure documents, and more, run the risk of opening the RICO window to the organized crime that is central to the US financial system. Its three loci of activity are the USFed, Goldman Sachs, and JPMorgan. This is just the financial wing of the syndicate. Apart from that is the war wing, with a common conduit in the USFed.
 
At great risk is ruin of the threads, tissue, and fiber of the nation. Many have called it the moral hazard in countless citations. The USDollar rests on the faith and trust of the USGovt. Enter systemic fraud and organized criminal activity, demonstrated in open court cases, and POOF, the faith and trust vanish. The USGovt might block some cases for national security reasons, the standard blanket to cover prevalent criminal behavior, a precedent started by Nixon. The same trust and faith underpin the USTreasury Bond complex, the debt securities for the USGovt debt. When the Fannie Mae failed toxic pool was adopted hookline & sinker in September 2008, the USTreasurys took on added risk, infected by the spread of toxic tissue and corrupted threads and absent moral fibers.
 
The original roots of the Fascist Business Model are difficult to trace in the United States. They could be from Big Oil, Wall Street Finance, Defense Contractors, even Big Pharma, but with timing in the 1970 or 1980 decades. The Vietnam War and deficit financing went hand in hand, a little recognized phenomenon. Full blossom of the business model, identified by a merger of the state with large corporate interests, took on new meaning after September 2001, when national security trumped everything, including the US Constitution, and certainly civil liberties. What came was license to commit financial crimes with impunity, provided the locus of criminal operations was a large corporation with direct association with the US Govt. Witness the ruinous fruit of the tight embrace endemic to the fascist business model. Witness the lack of prosecution for the perpetrators of criminal fraud. In fact, the larger the crime, the closer to zero is the likelihood of prosecution. Witness the popular backlash in civil disobedience from non-payment of mortgage bills. Witness the entrance finally into the arena of state courts, even some Supreme Courts like in Florida, Kansas, and elsewhere. Again, the defendant banks claim errors and mistakes, when the prosecutors are screaming fraud, forgery, theft, and corruption. A series of public spectacles comes soon.
 
The Fascist Business Model is so broadly affecting the USEconomy, like a grand latticework, that it is considered part of the American landscape, even grudgingly accepted as part of the system. It is diverse. A culture of fraud is engrained nationally, clearly perceived from foreign vantage points. See Halliburton and the missing $50 billion from the Iraq Reconstruction Fund. The firm is tied to former Vice President Cheney, and is the object of endless fraud accusations, prosecutions, and settlements related to the wars and their provided services. See Goldman Sachs and the 2004 reduction of the unleaded gasoline portion to the GS Commodity Index they manage, as the percentage was taken from 9% to 2%. Coordinated were drops in the price of gasoline, crude oil, and diesel. For some unexplained reason, the USMilitary decided to sell huge amounts of crude oil and diesel fuel at the exact time following the Goldman Sachs index alterations. The events occurred leading to the re-election of Bush Jr. The USMilitary, few realize, is the largest consumer of crude oil and diesel on the planet. See the Seven Sisters from Big Oil and the steady friendships forged with Saudi Arabia and points on the Persian Gulf. See the Citigroup tipoffs to Prince Al-Waleed, whose investments thrived for a while. See the cozy relationships between certain Big Pharma firms and the Swine Flu vaccines. See the British Petroleum oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico. This one is trickier. The US Environmental Protection Agency engaged in numerous ocean water data tampering examples. Clean-up crews were photographed in numerous instances dumping dead fish, each punishable by a $10 thousand fine, ostensibly with BP at risk. The EPA levied no fines.
 
The US Coast Guard was involved cordoning off numerous sites where dead whales were disposed of. The public was not permitted nearby access, but that did not stop intrepid photographers from capturing the events on film. Again, BP was at risk of heavy fines imposed. The most egregious violations involve Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, the agents for the USFed and USDept Treasury. Past actions featured gold leasing from Fort Knox (now empty), for the benefit of Wall Street gold short positions and corresponding USTreasury Bond long leveraged positions. That chapter was labeled the Decade of Prosperity. Insider trading and numerous illicit financial schemes prevail, while front running of policy is constant. These have become important income sources for the twin towers of syndicate finance. See Working Group for Financial Markets, hardly run by an independent pristine office. They operate with full impunity and even access to FBI usage. Refer to the UNIX box and stolen software taken from Goldman Sachs offices in 2009, retrieved dutifully by the FBI, a powerful sophisticated illicit tool used to read incoming stock trade orders.